Heidi Ihlen - Norwegian psychologist. Article “Heidi Ihlen” in Norwegian Wikipedia has 24.1 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 10 references and 2 sections.
Since the creation of article “Heidi Ihlen”, its content was written by 13 registered users of Norwegian Wikipedia and edited by 13 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.
The article is cited 3 times in Norwegian Wikipedia and cited 3 times in all languages.
The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:
The highest popularity rank from 2008:
There is 1 language version for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).
The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #27202 04.2014 |
Global: #2899290 02.2014 |
| Best Rank | Norwegian: #6093 07.2021 |
Global: #666171 12.2006 |
On 16 January 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Greenland, Donald Trump, María Corina Machado, Stranger Things, The Seven Dials Mystery, deaths in 2026, Avatar: Fire and Ash, The Housemaid, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, Seven Dials Mystery.
In Norwegian Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Forside, Færøyene, Arfan Bhatti, Mushaga Bakenga, Mesternes mester, Tore André Flo, Håndball-EM 2026 for menn, Kristin Størmer Steira, Ingebjørg Bratland, Kristin Holte.
The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information
$$Quality=1/c∑↙{i=1}↖c nm_i-RS=1/5(4.53+8.2+0+8+100)$$
where:
The results of the calculations may be slightly different because of rounded values of normalized metrics in formulas
